Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾÇÈÄÅð¼ö¼úÈÄ ¿¬Á¶Á÷Ãø¸ðÀÇ ¿¹Ãø¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

PREDICTION OF SOFT TISSUE PROFILE CHANGES AFTER MANDIBULAR SET-BACK SURGERY

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 24±Ç 1È£ p.60 ~ 67
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ»óÇÑ/Sang-Han Lee ±Ç´ë±Ù/±èÁø¼ö/ÀåÇöÁß/ÃÖÀç°©/Tae-Geon Kwon/Chin-Soo Kim/Hyon-Jung Jang/Jae-Kap Choi

Abstract

°á·Ð
º» ±³½Ç¿¡¼­ ÇϾÇÁö½Ã»ó°ñÀý´Ü¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ¾ÇÀüµ¹ÁõȯÀÚ 15¸í(³²ÀÚ 5¸í, ¿©ÀÚ 10¸í)À» ´ë
»óÀ¸·Î ¼úÀü±³Á¤Ä¡·áÀü(T1), ¼úÁ÷Àü(T2), ¼úÁ÷ÈÄ(T3), ¼úÈÄ 6°³¿ù(T4), ¼úÈÄ 18°³¿ù(T5)ÀÇ
º¯È­¸¦ °üÂûÇÏ¿© °æÁ¶Á÷ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿¬Á¶Á÷ÀÇ º¯È­¿Í ±× °ü·Ã¼ºÀ» °ËÅäÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº
°á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÇϾÇÀÇ ¿¬Á¶Á÷, °æÁ¶Á÷Àº ¼úÈÄ ÈĹæ, »ó¹æÀ¸·Î À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇϾÇÀÇ Æò±Õ À̵¿·®Àº Pog
¿¡¼­ 8.17mm¿´´Ù. ¼úÈÄ 18°³¿ùÀÇ °üÂû¿¡¼­ ÇϾÇÀÇ °æÁ¶Á÷Àº ºñ·Ï ÀûÀº ¾çÀÇ º¯È­°¡ ÀÖ±â´Â
ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³Àû ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
2. »ó, Çϼø¿¬Á¶Á÷Àº ¼úÈÄ-Àå±â°üÂû°£¿¡ º¯È­°¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª ÇϾÇÀ» µ¤Àº ¿¬Á¶Á÷Àº ¼úÈÄ-Àå
±â°üÂû°£¿¡ º°´Ù¸¥ º¯È­°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. »ó¼ø ÀϺÎ(Ls, stms)¿Í ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ÇϾǿ¬Á¶Á÷Àº ÇϾÇÈÄÅð
¼ö¼ú·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ÈÄ, »ó¹æÀ¸·Î ¿òÁ÷¿´À¸¸ç ¼úÈÄ 6°³¿ù¿¡¼­ ¼úÈÄ 18°³¿ù°£¿¡´Â ºñ±³Àû ¾ÈÁ¤Àû
À̾ú´Ù. 18°³¿ùÈÄ B'¿Í Pog'ÀÇ °æÁ¶Á÷ À̵¿¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬Á¶Á÷ À̵¿ºñÀ²Àº 84.7%, 74.7% ¿´´Ù.
3. ÇϾÇÈÄÅð¼ö¼úÈÄ ÇϾǿ¬Á¶Á÷À§Ä¡¸¦ Àå±âÀûÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº °æÁ¶Á÷À» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °Íº¸
´Ù ´õ ¾î·Á¿ì¸ç À¯ÀǼºµµ Àû¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ°ÍÀº ¼úÈÄ È¯ÀÚÀÇ ¾È¸ð¸¦ Á¤È®È÷ ¿¹ÃøÇس»±â´Â ¾î·ÁÀ»
»Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Åë»ó 1 : 1 ºñÀ²ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ Àû¿ë½ÃÅ°´Â ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ¾È¸ð¿¹Ãø ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¶§ ÁÖÀÇ
¸¦ ¿äÇÑ´Ù´Â °Í ÀǹÌÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
We usually accept 1 : 1 ratio soft tissue change in mandibular set-back surgery. But
we cannot sure whether we can use this ratio as a long term predictor after surgery.
We investigated the change of hard tissue and its effects to soft tissue and examined
the predictability of cephalometric analysis in short term and long term follow-up
periods in mandibular set-back surgery.
Subjects were 15 patients (5 male, 10 female) performed mandibular set-back
procedure only by BSSRO with tigid fixation. Cephalometric data were obtained before
orthodontic tretment, immediated before surgery and immediate after surgery, 6 months,
and 18 months after surgery consecutively. Differences in soft and hard tissue changes
among the time intervals were examined using analysis of vatiance (ANOVA) : the
association between immediate surgical change in chin landmarks and subsequent short
and long term soft and hard tissue changes were examined using linear regression
analysis
1. Soft tissue mandibular structures were positioned posteriorly and superiorly after
surgery. Average mandibular set-back were 8.17mm at Pog. The horizontal and vertical
hard tissue mandibular changes were stable for 18 months after surgery. Although there
was a small degree of change, soft tissue and hard tissue remain relatively stable after
surgery and there was no clinically discernable changes between 6 months and 18
months post-operatively.
2. some part of upper lip (Ls & stms) and most part of mandibular soft tissue moves
postero-superiorly mandibular set-back. The ratio of horizontal changes of hard tissue to
soft tissue at Inf. labial sulcus(B'), Pogonion(Pog') were 84.7%, 74.7% after 18 months,
respectively.
3. Predictability of the soft tissue change is less certain than hard tissue and this
predictability is decreased over time. These result suggests that we cannot predict the
surgical outcomes exactly. It is recommendable that the oral surgeon should be careful
in using the computerized surgical prediction software program as a predictor of long
term soft tissue change.

Å°¿öµå

Mandibular prognathism; Soft tissue profile changes and prediction;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed